We take it for granted these days the the stars are unimaginably bigger than the planets and the moons. However when girlfriend look at the sky, the does not appear this way.

The moon watch bigger and also brighter 보다 the stars. This leads me come wonder once smashville247.net first discovered the loved one size of the stars.

Did people believe that the moon to be bigger than the stars because that a long time?

If so, wherein was this believed, and up until when?

What explorations or observations led civilization to conclude the the stars space larger?


star earth the-moon history
re-publishing
boost this inquiry
monitor
edited Nov 15 "17 at 13:49
*

J. Chomel
1,34211 yellow badge99 silver- badges2828 bronze badges
inquiry Nov 13 "17 at 15:33
*

ktm5124ktm5124
15144 bronze badges
$\endgroup$
2
add a comment |

1 prize 1


active oldest Votes
8
$\begingroup$
as soon as did smashville247.net first discover that the stars are bigger 보다 the moon?

Your selection of words "discovery" suggests evidence, not simply hypothesis. The discovery that stars were prefer our sun wasn"t feasible until the distance to some adjacent stars was measured and also with that, a brightness comparison can be made in between stars and also our sun. That exploration was do in 1838.

You are watching: Are stars bigger than the moon

The very first person through that concept goes earlier to 450 BC. Short an overview and longer summary.

Quote:

Anaxagoras, who lived in Athens, Greece, approximately 450 BC (about 2450 year ago), thought that the Sun and also stars to be fiery stones, the the stars to be too much away for their warmth to it is in felt, and that the sunlight was perhaps an ext than a couple of hundred mile in size. Through that Anaxagoras was, as far as we know, the very first one to imply that the sun is a star. His concepts were met v disapproval and he was ultimately imprisoned because that impiety, due to the fact that his concepts did no fit the prejudices the the time.

So, if he said that stars were prefer our sun, his size was method off and also it"s unsure how large he believed the Moon was, or even, if he had a great idea how large the planet was. Erastosthenes" estimate came later.

Aristarchus of Samos came up v a lot better, yet still fairly inaccurate, measure of the Sun and also Moon"s size and he well-known that the Moon was smaller sized than the Earth and the Sun much larger. It"s uncertain what that thought about stars though.

And much an ext recently:

Christiaan Huygens that Holland lived from 1629 to 1695. He determined the street to the star Sirius, assuming the that star was together bright as the Sun and appeared faint only since of its an excellent distance. He uncovered that the street to Sirius have to be an extremely great. At this time, then, the idea the the sunlight is a star was considered seriously by scientists.

So the idea that stars were like our sun was popular and perhaps also accepted, for over 100 years prior to the size and brightness that stars was first accurately measured.

Did people believe that the moon to be bigger than the stars for a lengthy time?

This is tough to say. Aristarchus that Samos concepts were less well-known than Aristotle"s (who came a little earlier) and also Aristarchus" theory weren"t central to Ptolomy"s version which ended up being the model for end 1000 years. I"ve often wondered what could have been different if Aristotle and Aristarchus could have exchanged ideas. Aristotle can have learned something and re-written his model, but Aristarchus was born as well late.

Ptolomy, who"s design was accepted by the roman inn Catholic Church, didn"t pay much attention to size and, in fact, his model doesn"t account for size well at all. It"s one of the means that his model breaks down, yet his basic model had actually the Moon closer to the earth than the Sun, for this reason presumably he known that the sunlight was bigger than the Moon and also it"s not unreasonable come guess the Ptolomy could have said the planets are smaller sized than the moon. The stars, however, were because that the many part, no addressed.

See more: Is Table Salt Mixture Or Pure Substance, Is Table Salt A Pure Substance

*

If your concern is, in particular, what Aristotle, Ptolemy up v scholars in the middle eras thought about the dimension of stars in comparison to the moon, then, I have to say that i don"t know what was assumed about the size of the Moon and also stars, though Giovanni Bruno was melted at the stake for arguing stars were favor our sun. It"s entirely feasible most scholars thought stars were smaller than the Moon from the moment periods between Aristotle to Kepler. If someone knows more specifics, i encourage them to answer.

Not lengthy after Galileo and also Kepler, it seems to have actually become more generally accepted that stars were big and an extremely distant and also the Moon was relatively small through comparison.